Best Practices Party

December 9th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

Formed with independent consensus builders and Libertarians, with disenfranchised Republicans and Democrats adopted from congress

Is a coalition meant to overthrow status quo of corruption, waste, and ineffectiveness

Agrees to forget past political differences

Fiercely anti government corruption

Believes in healthcare for all US citizens

Believes in the best education for all US citizens

Believes in very strong environmental protection

Believes in an extremely simplistic tax structure like a flat tax or value added tax

Believes in free market economics

Believes in promoting pure American ideals globally - like human rights, political freedom, free speech, and environmentalism

The Best Practices Party believes in more and better intelligence infrastructure and more special forces, with less overt warfare

The Best Practices Party is fiercely antiterrorism (defined as any person or group who would support the death of noncombatant innocents - ie affiliated with any suicide bombing group for example - or most groups that define themselves as “jihadists”, “white supremacists”, “skinheads”, “racists”, etc.)

The Best Practices Party is highly Internet centric.

Believes in electronic government

Real time participatory community.

Believes in propping up the poorest and weakest citizens

Believes government should promote nonprofit work and volunteerism

Does not believe in subsidies for special interest groups - other than considerations for charities helping the sick and poor, those which government has failed to provide

Believes in advancement only by merit

Does not believe in “pork” or “horsetrading”

Does not believe in educational quotas, affirmative action, or the 8a program

Believes in transparency in government

Embraces all relevant technology to evolve the political model.

Believes in a line item veto

Does not believe in a nonmarket minimum wage

Believes in job training not welfare

Believes in teaching people to fish but not fishing for them, and believes the government should do same

Believes in fair trade

Believes in much higher standards for the press

Believes in much higher standards for Hollywood

Believes low taxes are good for rich and poor alike by encouraging additional investment of capital that will cycle through the economy - enhancing opportunity for all and perpetually raising the GDP, whereas raising taxes generally has the opposite effect

Believes in facts and statistics as opposed to political rhetoric

Believes teachers should be paid more than politicians or businesspeople if they live up to the highest standards

Believes companies who hire illegal aliens should be prosecuted for illegally harming the earnings power and security of American families

The Best Practices Party represents only common people; corporate interests just to the extent they reflect the interests of common people

All members stick to strict ethical guidelines as rolemodels and representatives of the common people

Concerned about the opinions of the average American taxpayers and encourages real time townhall and online townhall feedback.

The key is that the Best Practices Party constituency is Americans whose opinions count, and they are paying their fair share to support the success of the union.

The opinions of companies, lobbyists, and foreign countries or citizens do not count except to the extent it happens to align with the interests of average Americans.

Believes in “legal” immigration exclusively, for that matter everything else qualified as “legal” and nothing else “illegal” - do not support or condone the anarchy of illegal immigration

Believe immigration problems can be solved with government process reform (fix INS and ICE) and passage of new laws that enable more legal immigration and deal with existing illegals

Believes in gay “civil unions” with marriage benefits but not specifically “gay marriage” since some married people, religious and otherwise, want to keep their own right to exclusivity

The Best Practices Party specifically works against the interests of groups they identify as rich corrupt industries and lobbyists. While tobacco, alcohol, Hollywood, gun dealers, etc. may have legal products there is certainly nothing illegal about working against their interests in congress and in promotional arenas as First Amendment expression on behalf of the interests of common Americans.

The Best Practices Party believes in international coalition building and evolving crosscultural communications.

Thanks for reading.

Disrupt the Status Quo! – go Third Party!

Mann does NY, NY will never be the same

June 28th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

 

Those of you who know me realize I get a little antsy when I cant hear the waves breaking and feel the ocean air. I do love cities at night but I have aversion to the days with suits, horns, smog, rushing, dust in my eyes, traffic jams, and the basic vagaries of overpopulated societies. As such you don’t find me in New York City often. But I found a golden opportunity to meet with a lot of people I know and wanted to know all in one fell swoop surrounding an Internet related conference this week, so off I went.
Getting out of DC region was uneventful. A couple hours later xxxx said “What’s that smell?” and sure enough we were in Jersey. For the rest of Jersey I was singing the Sopranos theme song, with a few of the correct words. (Pause and start the song in your head) Then we hit a NY tunnel, much like a brick wall with nowhere to move for over an hour. So much for going against rush hour traffic.
We finally checked in to the Grand Hyatt which it turns out employs some of the stupidest, rudest people I have ever met, see below.
It took a while to understand why the elevators only went to some floors, something I learned about over and over all week by getting in the wrong elevators. Once I got in the suite I found there was no hard wire Internet connection. (I don’t do wireless, PDA, text message, etc.) The man on the phone was kind enough to tell us we could get dialup connection, oy veh. Then I went to the “business office” for a real connection. The first workstation I was using in the empty room didn’t work so I was moving my stuff to the next station over.
But the crazy B who works there said:
Sir are you using two workstations, you cant do that.
Me: But I am just moving over because that one doesn’t work.
B: Sir if you use two workstations I will have to charge you
Me: I am just moving over, I will be done in a minute
B: Sir you cant use two workstations
Me: Go ahead and charge me I need to get my work done now
B: Sir don’t raise your voice at me
Me: You said you had to charge me so I said go ahead and charge me,
whats the problem
B: Sir Im calling security if you raise your voice at me
Me: Lady call security but just leave me alone so I can do my work
10 minutes later I heard her talking to security behind my head
saying “its ok now”, as if she had tamed a wild beast.
The rest of the week went fantastic meeting-wise, and meeting new
friends and business associates, etc. And I will leave a big blank
spot here for you to imagine all night activities with crazy domainers.
Finally it was over, lots of caffeine, a little sleep, some pizza at
odd hours, and other good memories.
But alas it was checkout time which requires the attention of Hyatt
staff to get my car. I called them with the ticket number but when I
went down there I didn’t have the actual hard copy. Yet another dense
Hyatt worker, this time at the car checkout, went ballistic:
“If you don’t have the ticket we can’t get your car.” Me: “You
already called your guy to get my car when I called and gave you the
number, so the car is already on its way”
Then 15 minutes of her asking for our room numbers over and over,
writing stuff from my drivers license, screaming about all the
bureaucracies being caused in her company in relation to managing
this missing ticket, and how she would get yelled at by someone in
the future for this problem. At this point I volunteered that it
might be better than her customer screaming at her presently.
Finally we were out of there and for a parting shot I informed her
that since I paid for their most expensive suite all week that I
really didn’t appreciate her s..t. While I am no big shot she had no
idea who I was. What if I was Warren Buffet missing his parking
ticket and using two workstations in their hotel?
But even at 9PM there was another hour of traffic to get back through
the same stupid tunnel. So much for waiting out rush hour. Back to
Jersey smell and then later another huge traffic jam at 1AM in the
middle of godknowswhereville, and finally back home.
Overall impression: the whole thing was great, even including most of
NY other than the minor idiosyncrasies above; evenso I don’t think
you will see me there again soon.
PS: Best story I can repeat: In NY I met the father of one of my
business associates who is a very well respected businessman. He
was at a big Hollywood event last week. He saw a nametag that said
“Michael Mann” and ended up walking up to the gentleman and asking
him if he was the domain guy “Michael Mann”. At that point the famous
director named Michael Mann looked at him like he was crazy.
PSS: An associate of director Mann contacted me a few weeks ago about
buying my identity michaelmann.com. I told them $1 million donated to
charity of my choosing, but they walked.

More On Paris - J’ Aime Paris

June 28th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

I don’t understand why everyone has a hardon for this girl. I mean what did she really do so bad? A sex tape, smoking pot, drunk driving? Clearly bad stuff, but a saint by Hollywood standards.

Now that she is out of jail and has done her time for her crime why not let her just be a rich Hollywood model like Cindy Crawford. Last time I checked nobody told Cindy how useless she was because she doesn’t have a real job. Yet all day long reporters like Anderson Cooper and Bill O’Reilly pretend the fray is above them, while at the same time they beat her down in their diatribes, and bring idiots on their shows to disrespect the young lady. They are indignant the whole way to the bank at Paris’ expense.

The truth is that she is only one expression created by society, and being delivered by Hollywood, for our consumption. Ratings don’t lie. So if you don’t like her don’t watch her or others who speak about her, and you wont be bothered. If you do like her join the millions who will keep propping her up in the press.

To the extent Paris is a real person I think she is now totally harmless, and I bet will ultimately end up being a role model for other young ladies, but likely with more blips on the way as Hollywood would have it.

The status of Paris Hilton, Presidential Candidates, and Separation of Church and State

June 10th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

As of June 10, 2007.    Paris deserves the identical treatment as any other criminal who committed the same crimes in California. I am not sure if the judge gave her a harsh sentence or not. It seems she broke the law and spit in the face of the system several times before ever getting jail time. However, given the prison overcrowding in that state and consistently lenient sentencing, it seems that few nonviolent criminals get more than a day or two in jail. I am sure, however, that she did get special treatment when she was released for a vague medical condition, against the judges orders and totally outside of the normal protocol in similar situations. Once she was released due to whatever trickery her team concocted with the sheriff, it was absolutely unfair to send her back, just as she has cried out in court. Fire the jailer but don’t emotionally torture the young lady, especially given the sheriff’s department just made a huge deal about her emotional weakness when releasing her. 

If I was to guess I would say if Paris lived in the real world she would probably be pretty nice and harmless. Her cohort Nicole however seems like an anorexic drug addict most of the time, with serious emotional issues, possibly inflamed by her inability to compete with Paris. Note to Nicole: get over it, practically nobody in the world can compete with Paris’ fame, beauty, and wealth at the same time. 

As of today she told the press she is no longer breaking down and will serve her time without appeal. I am hoping she will be out of jail before 45 days given how poorly she has been treated at this stage. I also think it is important to stress that jail is no laughing matter, even for 45 days. People could easily be physically, emotionally or socially harmed in jail from day one. However, I think that Paris will be segmented from the population and get better treatment and protection so it is less risky for her. Overall I think she may have deserved some jail time but it bothers me to see people gloating about it as if jail is no big deal for a young lady, or anyone else. 

The presidential candidates had debates this week and have been talking their heads off on TV in general, leaving me with some impressions. 

First of all I think almost all of them are smart and well spoken, and even well intentioned, especially some of those with no chance of winning. However, I think there is no reason to discuss ones that have no chance so I will focus on the announced candidates with the greatest chances of success: Clinton, Obama, Edwards, McCain, Giuliani, and Romney for the time being. 

While I enjoy each of them in some respects I dislike all of them in many respects too. For me the most important qualities are trustworthiness, political and military leadership potential, the ability to serve the economy, and theit interest in serving the poor and sick. 

For the Dems I only trust Obama from what little I know about him, but I think Hillary would be the best leader and has a real affinity for the common man. Also I think Hillary has the best chance of winning so far. I respect Edwards for his lifelong commitment to fight poverty but I really just don’t like him. Aside from being annoying I will have to just go with a gut feeling on him. 

Overall Obama is too green so I will have to vote for Hillary as the leader of the Dems for now eventhough I really don’t trust her overall or have any particular affinity for her given her populist flip flopping and consistent patronage to special interest groups. 

For the GOP I feel similar about Giuliani as I do about Edwards, just don’t like him, a gut feeling. However I bet he would kick the asses of the terrorists, so that I am fond of. 

Romney says some really strange stuff and flip flops plenty himself. I don’t trust him but he will get the terrorists good, and he would perhaps be a great leader due to his apparent business acumen. Also I heard he got healthcare for all Massachusetts residents, not bad for a Republican. 

McCain, don’t trust him, but he will kick the crap out of the terrorists I hope. He has been around the block enough to have plenty of special interest skeletons and flipflopping. Overall Romney is fresher than McCain, a better businessman, and equally likely to get the terrorists and be a real leader. And if he could solve the
US healthcare crisis that would be huge. Again I don’t like him though overall. And I don’t like the slate of candidates overall as you can tell. 

Who else can enter that would have a chance and what would I think of them? Newt Gingrich would be the smartest of all candidates and as tough on terror as any, and likely a decent leader and businessman. But this guy has lots of skeletons and there is something scary about him, so I think I might still prefer Romney but stay tuned.Fred Thompson? No thanks. We don’t need another actor in office, and he seems physically weak and unlikely to win in any event. 

For the Dems offhand the only unannounced person who could win the primary may be Gore. Clearly he is a leader in the environmental movement and that is laudable. However speaking of a gut feeling of someone I don’t trust, or like their  personality, he takes the cake, so now way. John Kerry, ditto on that. 

So I am still left with Hillary for my favored and the likely winner for the Dems and Romney for my favorite for the GOP (although I think McCain is more likely to win). Now to choose between my top picks. Hmm. Not easy since I don’t like either of them. I guess I will pick Romney as the best potential business and war leader, and because he adamantly promised to clean up Washington. Romney has done good on healthcare legislation while Hillary has failed at the same on the national level. Hillary is the epitome of Washington in many ways, she is old news, so let’s bring in an outsider and see if they will actually do what they promise. Romney is top pick to date. 

BTW, in case it hasn’t occurred to you I am neither a Democrat or Republican. I think both parties have consistently abrogated their constitutional mandates to serve common Americans in favor of their self interests and those of the special interest groups with which they are aligned. Read an old blog of mine further below for my diatribe on the reasons to support a viable third party. 

Separation of church and state is a well respected and critical American tradition. However it is almost impossible to apply consistently and completely. 

Why do we debate whether one can swear on a Koran versus swearing on a bible. Would you trust a witness more if they swore on a bible even if it is not the book of their religion? I would trust someone more if they swore on their own chosen book. 

Does it even matter since the church doesn’t belong in the court in the first place theoretically, eventhough it makes sense due to our traditions? Also why not just make people swear on the lives or memories of their mothers. I think that would work better if the state is in the business of forcing people to swear to something in order to get them to tell the truth. 

The point is that separation is not absolute, we have to balance it with tradition and the wishes of the stakeholders in the system, and to draw lines in certain places, eventhough they will offend some groups against the majority. 

If separation of church and state were absolute we’d also have to remove the word “God” from our currencies, and take the pledge of allegiance out of public institutions, more things antithetical to the wishes of average Americans and their traditions. 

Worried about separation of church and state? Get over it because there is no easy solution and it is not nearly the most important issue of the day. 

See you next month.

On George Spookie Tenet

April 30th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

This guy is a piece of work. I haven’t read his book and I am not sure I want to because, even if it is interesting, he is a big liar.

I like to pretend that with little information I can spot a liar, and in Tenet’s case here is why:

Everyone from the CIA is a liar, especially the boss or ex-boss.

He is implicated in the worlds biggest PR and political disaster.

His basic story of claiming his “slam dunk” comment was about selling the war and not about nukes is totally implausible on its face.

He is clearly committed to making Cheney look bad for basic revenge.

He is a nervous talker and looks guilty.

So there you have it. Another political disgrace. Lets not buy his stupid book.

On Imus Situation

April 14th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

Clearly Imus is a huge jerk. He always has been from what I can tell. That is his schtick. It apparently sells. But I can’t understand what the market liked about him in the first place. And why market forces didn’t put him out of business before now. Or Howard Stern for that matter.

Also why didn’t Sharpton and Jackson attempt to take advantage of this predicament before now by pressuring long time advertisers and network execs of this exact same format to pull out of this and other shows? Politically correct hype of the day is the answer, in silent conspiracy with the press - pundits sensationalizing the issues and attempting to make themselves heroes of the black community. The press is just selling ad space. They could give a crap about what is fair, racist, or truly politically correct. One fall guy and lots of ad sales and book sales is what comes from the whole event.

I think Imus should be able to say whatever he wants. Jesse Jackson isn’t totally credible himself. And Sharpton is a horrible scum bag. The biggest racist one could imagine and a caught cocaine dealer. (See Sharpton and Jackson references in my blog entries below, with special emphasis on Twana Brawley)

I think Jackson and Sharpton and Imus should say whatever they want whenever they want, but I don’t know why anyone would listen to them, other than Jackson on occasion.

In any case how come the racist musicians don’t get booted from their labels for selling their lame art? Because in America we have freedom of speech. Save your indignation or use it in all venues. Identifying with the outrage of the week, while ignoring grander long term social problems and racism is folly.

In the Imus event there are some true heroes. The main one is the coach of the Rutgers basketball team, Vivian Stringer, who very clearly expressed what the issues are, why it is evil to engage in such speech, how great those athletes really are, how society can heal, and last but not least she led the team to forgive Imus. Proving that the team and the coach are real winners; the goal of every team. The clear idiots are Imus, Jackson, Sharpton, the TV and radio execs, the press, and anyone who bought this act hook, line, and sinker.

Let’s wipe out racist, sexist idiots from the marketplace by not listening to it or watching it, and by expressing our outrage every day in their faces and those of their advertisers. Let’s not facilitate any of the bad characters in making self serving press events when it’s easy for them.

When we look back 50 years from now, most of the press activities and a lot of the music we are listening to today will be considered moronic and deceptive, with this Imus period of time as an excellent example.

Apple convergence

March 27th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

Until today I really didn’t have much affinity for Apple, other than for Jobs himself. I thought that my coworkers spent too much on their boxes, I didn’t like the hype, and I thought the graphics on my PC were just fine anyhow. I have never used a Mac or studied much about it, just press releases and hype.

Now I finally realize that Jobs has positioned Apple to be the preferred technology provider for the future of technology, a nice positon. For me “convergence” is the future of technology. Jobs’ strategy will disintermediate dozens of large wannabe leaders.

The exciting part is how their strategy comes together. First of all there is the PC or Mac which can download any multimedia, including anything made by any consumer in the world, just minutes after it’s produced, or streamed realtime if necessary - a bunch of ones and zeros over fiber or wireless, direct to your PC. Each piece of content is easily indexed on your own PC and online, given appropriate tagging.

Next Apple created the iPod, which is merely a hard drive and its display, with full multimedia capacity and an easy user interface. This is an obvious and extremely popular invention.

Next Apple is creating the iPhone. Given we bought Phone.com to do some similar things (before them) I am obviously a big believer and promoter of VOIP telecom, which is naturally convergent with many other Internet connected apps, and soon with our RFID and biometrics too.

Next Apple announced the iTV, an obvious product to go within their array. This is when I realized how it all came together and how far ahead they really are. The beauty of this strategy is that in the future the TV, Phone, iPod, and PC can be almost indistinguishable, other than the ala carte features chosen, and the display size and placement.

The iTV can easily wirelessly beam the very same content to the iPhone which can also beam the same content to any enabled device. That same content can be viewed on the TV, Phone, iPod, and PC screens respectively. It’s all interchangeable and therefore convergent like it should be.

Apple also opened up the content flow by creating iTunes, an easy way for publishers to deliver bits of licensed content and collect fees. Obviously a good idea.

If it didn’t strike you yet, you should realize that they will try to open up licensed online television distribution too, another thing Im a huge fan of. In other words you will log in and download the shows you want easily and legally.

iTunes, iTV, and others will continue to leverage the opportunity to fill technology applications with uploaded user controlled content like YouTube.

Apple will also make all applications user-friendly I’m sure and allow most of the content pieces to be easily managed and altered, be they TV shows, phone calls,or rock concerts.

This is why I am suddenly a fan of Apple and maybe I should review their stock despite my disdain for Wall Street listed companies. LMK what I’m missing. Peace.

Eye Rock and a Hard Place

February 16th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

My opinion is that it was a good idea in theory to remove the regime of the Hitler of the Middle East (Saddam). The original correct reasons (not nukes) to go in to Iraq include:

-They sponsored terrorists by pledging $25,000 to the families of all Hamas suicide bombers. Bush had warned all sponsors of terror and it was too late to back off.

-They attacked their neighbors, Kuwait

-They gassed their own people, the Kurds

-They killed many Shiite and repressed the rest of their majority

-They sent bombs in to residential neighborhoods in Israel, a longtime US ally and only democracy in the Middle East.

-They tortured anyone they didn’t like just like the Nazis.

-The women in their country were kept like slaves

-The country was ruled by a minority of mad men, not the popular will

-The United Nations voted for it unanimously

-The US Congress voted for it in majority

Great reasons to overthrow an evil dictator if there could be any.

Back to the current problems:

-The Iraqis in general do not understand or have any history of democracy

-They have a long history of civil hatred between Sunni and Shiite and Kurd

-They will keep fighting over oil revenue and legacy sectarian differences

-They hate America so spending more American lives, time and money will never get us love and respect

-The Americans allowed inhumane treatment at Abu Gharab which irretrievably sabotaged our reputation

-Many other hideous acts of Americans have been discovered although they are certainly the exception to the best and most respectable fighting force in world history.

-The Europeans, led by the useless French and German governments, have not helped the US in gaining international consensus which would have been required to exert enough pressure on the Sunni, Shiite, and CIA leaders to cut a deal creating civility and stability.

This is the only thing that has any chance of working eventhough it’s a long shot at best and there will be massive bloodshed in advance.

——————————

The US government is the very definition of a large convoluted bureaucracy and its decisions reflect the consensus of the sausage making process. The politicians voted in majority to support an attack on Iraq, and so it was.

Once that happened we realized the president’s PR was all based on false premises disclosed by the CIA. Rational parties may differ as to what they believe the president ostensibly knew for certain.

There were lots of good reasons to destroy Saddam’s regime. But the first problem was that the Bush administration didn’t promote the correct reasons, or do so properly.

In any event the white house spin from ‘02 is just a side show; the real travesty is the horrible execution in the war; and the fact that now there will perpetually be no “right” solution. This means more blood and death and destruction and hate.

BTW, the Iraq police force has no credibility and if the US leaves they will either scatter or be destroyed by Sunni mad men. Also the Shiite death squads will exact revenge on the Sunnis as they are doing now. A big civil war will evolve, while today is a small one with the US in the middle for no possible gain.

I am hoping for a deal between parties that are ready for peace and are tired of perpetuating more suffering for their people.

This isn’t a joke but give me a break anyhow.

ANNA ANNA ANNA ANNA ANNA NICOLE SO OUTRAGEOUS

February 7th, 2007 - Politics - No Comments

Anna Nicole was once a regular girl. And typical American poverty and family issues mixed with a high demand for strippers led her to become one.

Then she was fortunate (or unfortunate) to marry a really rich dude who was about to die. Golddigging and attempting to buy love are also American traditions.

So here we have all the raw materials for disaster. Wealth, sex, drugs, immaturity, and cameras. You could see it coming like a freight train.

Add death of her husband and a lot of lawyers (an American favorite), and then increasing drug addiction……. then the train is about to hit a wall.

Next the train does hit the wall when the drug addicted and depressed son, Daniel, dies. Who was watching his interests? Was this enough of a wake up call for anyone?

How about to the doctor who prescribed the methadone to the 8 month pregnant noninjured Anna, and the many others who enabled her? The doctor is likely drugging Howard too, and the dead son previously. Hopefully we’ll see the doctor in handcuffs and maybe Howard too if there are facts against him.

Next thing you know, the star herself is dead. So who is to blame if anyone?

First of all she is, since she is an adult with freewill. Next Stern who should have protected all of them as her attorney, lover, business partner, and 24×7 companion.

Next the businesspeople who had anything to do with her TV show, since they allowed her physical and mental state to deteriorate in front of cameras merely for money. The incompetence in Hollywood is alarming.

Next take in to account all the other men she apparently slept with and any women; each failed to protect her.

Also the paparazzi did not try to help her and did profit on her, like they did with Princess Di.

Overall what killed her is her own lack of willpower within her Hollywood lifestyle. But, since Hollywood is just a reflection of the wishes and vices of Americans, we created Anna I’m sorry to say.

Friendly fire, natural selection, and peace

February 6th, 2007 - Politics - 1 Comment

I heard the sound clip of US military pilots who accidentally killed a British soldier on the ground.  They instantly understood from their heart that this was one of their own and therefore immediately began crying, getting sick, and even expecting a jail term.

Interestingly seconds earlier and throughout their careers they were dropping bombs on “the enemy”. And occasionally there must be an innocent person mixed in, but they don’t know whom or when.

In any event their normal reaction to killing is not very emotional but killing their own hurts them inside.

Therein lays the problem of war – each party sees themselves as separate from the other. Socio-politico-religious groups will do anything to protect their own including bombing others, but they will cry when theirs are harmed.

Once you “take sides” you will defend yours until the end and hurt the others in the same process. If we are all on the same side of humanity this would not be a problem. Miscommunications and misinformation are the ultimate reasons for war.

So if we communicate better with the rest of the world and cut deals to solve problems then we will have less bloodshed and economic hardships.

Send 2 cents